.. _performance:

Performance tunning
===================

It is important to remember that by default ``django-guardian`` uses generic
foreign keys to retain relation with any Django model. For most cases it's
probably good enough, however if we have a lot of queries being spanned and
our database seems to be choking it might be a good choice to use *direct*
foreign keys. Let's start with quick overview of how generic solution work and
then we will move on to the tunning part.


Default, generic solution
-------------------------

``django-guardian`` comes with two models: :model:`UserObjectPermission` and
:model:`GroupObjectPermission`. They both have same, generic way of pointing to
other models:

- ``content_type`` field telling what table (model class) target permission
  references to (``ContentType`` instance)
- ``object_pk`` field storing value of target model instance primary key
- ``content_object`` field being a ``GenericForeignKey``. Actually, it is not
  a foreign key in standard, relational database meaning - it is simply a proxy
  that can retrieve proper model instance being targeted by two previous fields

.. seealso::

    https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.4/ref/contrib/contenttypes/#generic-relations

Let's consider following model:

.. code-block:: python

    class Project(models.Model):
        name = models.CharField(max_length=128, unique=True)


In order to add a *change_project* permission for *joe* user we would use
:ref:`api-shortcuts-assign` shortcut:

.. code-block:: python

    >>> from guardian.shortcuts import assign_perm
    >>> project = Project.objects.get(name='Foobar')
    >>> joe = User.objects.get(username='joe')
    >>> assign_perm('change_project', joe, project)

What it really does is: create an instance of :model:`UserObjectPermission`.
Something similar to:

.. code-block:: python

    >>> content_type = ContentType.objects.get_for_model(Project)
    >>> perm = Permission.objects.get(content_type__app_label='app',
    ...     codename='change_project')
    >>> UserObjectPermission.objects.create(user=joe, content_type=content_type,
    ...     permission=perm, object_pk=project.pk)



As there are no real foreing keys pointing at the target model this solution
might not be enough for all cases. In example if we try to build an issues
tracking service and we'd like to be able to support thousends of users and
their project/tickets, object level permission checks can be slow with this
generic solution.


.. _performance-direct-fk:

Direct foreign keys
-------------------

.. versionadded:: 1.1

In order to make our permission checks faster we can use direct foreign key
solution. It actually is very simple to setup - we need to declare two new
models next to our ``Project`` model, one for ``User`` and one for ``Group``
models:

.. code-block:: python

    from guardian.models import UserObjectPermissionBase
    from guardian.models import GroupObjectPermissionBase

    class Project(models.Model):
        name = models.CharField(max_length=128, unique=True)

    class ProjectUserObjectPermission(UserObjectPermissionBase):
        content_object = models.ForeignKey(Project)

    class ProjectGroupObjectPermission(GroupObjectPermissionBase):
        content_object = models.ForeignKey(Project)


.. important::
   Name of the ``ForeignKey`` field is important and it should be
   ``content_object`` as underlying queries depends on it.


from now on ``guardian`` will figure out that ``Project`` model has direct
relation for user/group object permissions and will use those models. It is
also possible to use only user or only group based direct relation, however it
is discouraged (it's not consistent and might be a quick road to hell from the
mainteinence point of view, especially).

.. note::
   By defining direct relation models we can also tweak that object permission
   model, i.e. by adding some fields